Laurn Ashley - Not Miss Beverly Hills 2010...haha
In a move fit for royalty the city of Beverly Hills issued a statement claiming upcoming Miss California contender, Lauren Ashley, has no right to represent the city. The city says it holds no connection, sponsorship or representation any pageant whatsoever. Apparently Lauren Ashley is self-proclaiming her status as Miss Beverly Hills 2010.
From the Los Angeles Times:
Lauren Ashley, a Miss California USA contestant and outspoken opponent of same-sex marriage, claims Beverly Hills as the city she represents. Beverly Hills lays no claim to her whatsoever.
Quite the opposite. In a statement Wednesday, the city said it was shocked by Ashley’s description of herself as “Miss Beverly Hills.” The city “does not sponsor a beauty pageant and has no association with Miss California USA,” the statement said. “As such, there should be no individual claiming the title of Miss Beverly Hills.”
The city’s statement said Ashley lives in Pasadena and “does not represent Beverly Hills in any capacity.”
This comes after a Fox News segment featuring Lauren Ashley with her views on traditional marriage and opposition of same-sex marriage. It is there that she quoted Leviticus from the Bible and allured viewers to perceive Ashley feels gays should be put to death. Like many beauty queens before her such as Carrie Prejean and Sarah Palin, Ashley says she’s got lots of gay friends. According to the now defunct Miss Beverly Hills, she discusses her beliefs with those and others in an adult manner and there are not hard feeling on either side. Whaaaaaa? Ok, then.
I don’t know about the rest of you but this whole beauty queen stuff is getting old and boring. Do these booby flaunting babes (yes, that includes Sarah Palin – I’ll take a jab at her every chance I get.) really think the right wing three leggers are gonna fall for this crap? I mean come on, even those guys are smarter than that – I hope. Move over Lauren Ashley and let the next poster bitch give it tray. I’m quite sure there’s one in waiting.
You might Lika these posts:
Hmmm…. Just got an email from someone at a .gov extension saying it would be advisable to remove a certain word in reference to Sarah Palin. I’m not really sure who it was and I won’t list the domain. I decided to remove the offending word for which the person was referencing.
Apparently someone didn’t like that I said “bitch queens” rather than “beauty queens.” Nothing was mentioned about “booby flaunting” which I can only assume is because it’s a true statement – Gotta love the gov.
I must agree that flaunting boobs for a competition doesn’t make one a bitch. My apologies if my commentary was misinterpreted as such. In all honesty the proclamation to deny another person’s right of equality based on sexual orientation does make you a bitch whether you are male or female. I’m very gender neutral in mindset and frankly, being a bitch has nothing to do with boobies.